Last evening I took Ella on a 2 km hasty. Weather, environment and wind near perfect. It was an area we have not trained in before and walked on rarely. I kitted her up and set her and me up as per any normal search. I knew there were no mispers out - she didn't. All went well (including a surprise 'reward' at the end to keep her interest) other than when unintentionally we met extraneous walkers and cyclists. They were all on our path and obvious to see. Whilst i wasn't surprised that she blanked the cyclists (as we've never searched for a moving cyclist ever and why would you) I was bit surprised that she didn't attempt an alert on the two individuals on foot. OK both had dogs with them (which she studiously ignored) and also the humans (who she briefly checked out) weren't behaving in the traditonal 'misper' manner of hiding behind trees at 25ms off a path.
Question: is she conditioned by training to only alert at stationary mispers, prone mispers or hidden mispers? We have trained on stationary / sitting mispers in view before (with mixed results) and hidden stationary ones that moved once first found (great results) but I wonder on this occassion if the presence of other dogs made her discount the 'attached' human as a possible target on the basis of a human with a dog can't possibly be lost??
Not a big issue (is it an issue anyway?) as I would have seen them (aka a misper) in a real situation but interested in hearing anyone's thoughts?